Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Wanting Ignorance is not seeking bliss, it is a shameful bane
Unawareness is close to death and.... Ignorance is no @#$$%#& bliss!!! Knowledge is the only redeemer. You can learn and progress through human life only if you embrace the need of AWARENESS. If not, we better start writing some literature about the Inverse-Darwin's theory of Evolution.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
on grey clouds
I am so over-confident about myself sometimes that I cease to think I am human.
I am so under-confident sometimes that I cease to think I am human!
I am so under-confident sometimes that I cease to think I am human!
After some years, when we meet...
We may not have anything common to talk about; this happens to everyone in the world. You can call it diminishing value of human relations
If you meet frequently, people get used to you, if you do not meet at all, all you can talk about when meeting up later are the 'old times' talks...
I think human life is too predictable. Do people try out new things?
If you meet frequently, people get used to you, if you do not meet at all, all you can talk about when meeting up later are the 'old times' talks...
I think human life is too predictable. Do people try out new things?
Most of the things are not definitely ordinal
What is right and what is wrong? What is blue and what is dark shade of violet? What is courteous and what remains defined as audacious?
There may a distribution of all things with every aspect just plotted in between the upper and the lower extremes.
Who is trustworthy, who is creative, who is naive and how to select a prospective candidate.The relative cut-off point and thresholds for confidence intervals are seldom close to universal acceptance level. Here is where fate, providence, compromise and oblique understanding of fundamental concepts gathers its grounds.
Is Corruption really defined? Does praying have an other effects than just mollifying pain/suffering? Who is more at blame in a situation of increasing social economical differences:
1. the beggar
2. the society
3. the people who stride past him ignoring his presence
4. the government
5. the guy who gives alms and sets an expectation of dependent survival possibility for the beggar
You may have some ordinal answers. But try applying them switching places with the antagonist selected by you previously and answer the same above. How relative is your answer to life and how righteous is the appeal?
What do we like and what do we hate? Is it necessary to keep the distinction more of less constant over the years or keep changing opinions as quickly as possible? By doing the former, you may get labelled as presumptous and by sticking safely to the latter, you may fall into the category of irresolute and the cause of today's lack of universal convictions.
Returning to the primary problem, the primary solution is to grade the right/wrong, like/dislike in a distribution of personal as well as social agreement. Taking the decision will always remain non-definite to conserve the beauty of in-congruence and colorfulness of human existence.
Love it or hate it, life is not an multiple answers objective question paper we are so used to answering through the resourcefully exhausted 8 adolscent years of our student life.
There may a distribution of all things with every aspect just plotted in between the upper and the lower extremes.
Who is trustworthy, who is creative, who is naive and how to select a prospective candidate.The relative cut-off point and thresholds for confidence intervals are seldom close to universal acceptance level. Here is where fate, providence, compromise and oblique understanding of fundamental concepts gathers its grounds.
Is Corruption really defined? Does praying have an other effects than just mollifying pain/suffering? Who is more at blame in a situation of increasing social economical differences:
1. the beggar
2. the society
3. the people who stride past him ignoring his presence
4. the government
5. the guy who gives alms and sets an expectation of dependent survival possibility for the beggar
You may have some ordinal answers. But try applying them switching places with the antagonist selected by you previously and answer the same above. How relative is your answer to life and how righteous is the appeal?
What do we like and what do we hate? Is it necessary to keep the distinction more of less constant over the years or keep changing opinions as quickly as possible? By doing the former, you may get labelled as presumptous and by sticking safely to the latter, you may fall into the category of irresolute and the cause of today's lack of universal convictions.
Returning to the primary problem, the primary solution is to grade the right/wrong, like/dislike in a distribution of personal as well as social agreement. Taking the decision will always remain non-definite to conserve the beauty of in-congruence and colorfulness of human existence.
Love it or hate it, life is not an multiple answers objective question paper we are so used to answering through the resourcefully exhausted 8 adolscent years of our student life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)